Saturday, May 16, 2020
Trumanââ¬â¢s Horrible Mistake to Use the Atomic Bomb Essay
The war was coming to a victorious conclusion for the Allies. Germany had fallen, and it was only a matter of time until Japan would fall as well. Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson was at the forefront of the American war effort, and saw atomic weaponry as a way out of the most monumental war ever. As discussed in Cabell Phillipsââ¬â¢ book, The Truman Presidency: The History of a Triumphant Succession, Stimson was once quoted as saying that the atomic bomb has ââ¬Å"more effect on human affairs than the theory of Copernicus and the Law of Gravityâ⬠(55). Stimson, a defendant of dropping the bomb on Japan, felt that the world would never be the same. If the world would change after using atomic weapons, could it possibly have changed forâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦Necessity is the mother of invention. Michael Blow wrote in his book, The History of the Atomic Bomb, that the United States was building an atomic weapon for the main purpose of beating the Germans to the creation of the bomb (95-96). After uranium was used to create atomic fission in Berlin in 1939, Albert Einstein and other scientists wrote a letter to Roosevelt, talking him into government funding for atomic research in America (Foner and Garraty, ââ¬Å"Manhattanâ⬠n. pag.). In a bit of irony, American leaders believed that the Germans, in the race to create the ultimate weapon, were beating them. In actuality, however, they never got far in their research, and America defeated them by a sizeable amount (Blow 96). In the United States, research for the ââ¬Å"Manhattan Project,â⬠the code name for the secret project to use atomic energy to create a bomb, expanded all around the country. This included universities such as Columbia, Princeton, California, and Chicago. While the research had been independent and government funded up until the middle of 1942, the army took over guidance of the project at that point. The possibility of an atomic bomb had become too re alistic to keep the research in the private sector (Foner and Garraty, ââ¬Å"Manhattanâ⬠). In the later years leading up to the bombing, a committee was created to assess the decision of whether to use the bomb. This group, known as the Interim Committee, had two objectives - to control atomic energy,Show MoreRelatedAtomic Bombs And Its Effects On Japan1369 Words à |à 6 PagesCan you imagine how many atomic bombs that have killed many Japanese during, World War II in Japan? On August 6, 1945, a new weapon with a significant explosive power known as the atomic bombs just has been dropped on Japan. The dropping of this weapon on Hiroshima and Nagasaki there were 262,020 civilians were killed. The United States to chose the atomic bomb in order for Japan to surrender and end the war quickly. Likewise, President Truman as the duty as president and Commander in Chief to protectRead MoreThe Justifications of Merciless Killing by the U.S1605 Words à |à 7 PagesIs it possible that a country, like the United States, could be as ruthless as Hitler himself? The press rel ease given to the public by President Truman attempts to justify the need for the use of a potent weapon, while diverting the attention from the harmful effects: however, other documents such as, Trumanââ¬â¢s Diary, a survivorââ¬â¢s story and recent newspapers recognize the harmful effects and the amount of destruction that would be a result of the weapon being used. They ignored the most importantRead MoreA Closer Look at the Bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki1485 Words à |à 6 Pageshistory was changed. Two atomic bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima, and three days later, August 9, 1945, on Nagasaki that ended World War II. Japan had already been a defeated nation from conventional bombs and World War II. Many innocent lives were lost, psychological scars were left on the lives of the bomb survivors, and thus many lives were changed forever. The atomic bombings caused many people to have genetic effects due to the radiation from the bombs. Revisionist s have saidRead More Hiroshima Essays3123 Words à |à 13 PagesSaved Millions nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; The atomic bomb and its use over the two Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is still a source of heated debate even over fifty years later. Many people on both sides -Japan and The United States- hold the belief that Trumans decision to drop the bomb was a mistake and that under no circumstances should such drastic measures be taken in war. What these people do not realize are the far more horrible alternatives than the destruction of just two cities:Read MoreThe Culture of the Cold War Essay3260 Words à |à 14 Pagesanything and we could use any force for the preventive action. Any force also constituted nuclear military engagement in the minds of many public servants. As Truman announced to America that the Russians also had the bomb many realized how catastrophic a full-blown war with the communists could be. Whitfield writes about how the threat of complete annihilation didnââ¬â¢t scare everyone within the military power system, and how some like the chairman of the c ongressional committee on Atomic energy felt that
Wednesday, May 6, 2020
Career Aspirations - 1515 Words
What are your career aspirations and how will the internship module help you to achieve them? Introduction My name is Praveen Divakaran B.Tech Degree in Electrical Electronics form Saintgits College of Engineering (2009). PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Two years of work experience as a Sales Engineer for Gulf Services and Industrial Supplies Co.LLC in Water Equipmentââ¬â¢s Division ââ¬â Oman. Employer Profile: Gulf Services and Industrial Supplies Co. LLC is a part of Arabi WLL Group, one of the prominent business houses in Kuwait. GSIS is one of the leading trading houses in Oman deals with different kinds of Industrial products and Machineries across the Sultanate of Oman. SKILLS: * Strong interpersonal and communicationâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦(The above ones are taken from our uni website have 2 change the sentence ) End ------------------------------------------------- Summary The Marketing MBA covers both the business and strategy elements of marketing. It provides a further specialist route to those who wish to customize their programme to ensure a combination of generic MBA elements, in addition to some specialist coverage of the marketing function and an awareness of contemporary marketing issues. You will develop and apply analytical and decision-making techniques required within a senior management role in the marketing sector ------------------------------------------------- Why study Marketing MBA * Enables students to achieve a critical awareness of a range of contemporary issues and new developments in marketing * The Master of Business Administration (MBA) is the worldââ¬â¢s premier business qualification * Learning to manage in this business context requires new and higher levels of knowledge, business and personal skills * Companies will continue to seek graduate MBA students with a view to renewing and refreshing their organizations. Future The MBA is a means of enhancing your career prospects as well as opening doors for future middle and senior managers ââ¬â our aim is that the Coventry University Business School MBA will enable you to meet your career aspirations successfully and quickly. It finds that these workers are focused onShow MoreRelatedMarketing and Career Aspirations Essay1284 Words à |à 6 Pageswell. My career aspirations are to be a successful manager in the field of marketing research. Through the process of achievement I want to gain immense knowledge and skills so that I can contribute as much as possible in the society as well as in the organization. My life goal is to be work in every possible way for the betterment of the society and return back to the society. I have always been a keen social worker and will continue to remain so. Marketing Research will support my career aspirationsRead MoreMy Aspiration For A Technical Career936 Words à |à 4 Pagesfavorites and obtaining solutions to them would leave me with a sheer feeling of ecstasy. I always did and always would thrive on solving the most challenging problems. With a compelling desire to excel, hard work became my second nature. My aspiration for a technical career prompted me to take up one of the most coveted undergraduate program in Information Technology at University of Pune. During the first two years of undergraduate study, I was introduced to courses like Theory of Computation, Data structureRead MoreMy Career Aspirations : A Case Essay2136 Words à |à 9 PagesINTRO AND CAREER ANALYSIS My career aspirations are to become a tax attorney or tax lawyer. I have wanted to be a lawyer ever since second grade when we did a mock trial in the classroom. It was only recently that I narrowed down my concentration to a specialized field in taxation. As a tax attorney, my job will include handling ââ¬Å"a variety of tax-related issues for individuals and corporationsâ⬠(Lawyers: Occupational Outlook Handbook 2015). My job will also include ââ¬Å"[helping] clients navigate complexRead MoreNursing Career Aspirations Essay1831 Words à |à 8 Pagesis the pursuit of life and happiness. On this journey, many important decisions are considered and made. One of these decisions should be the pursuit of a career path. There are many different career opportunities one can choose to pursue. In my career path, I have chosen a career in the nursing field. This path that I have chosen is not a career that is for the faint of heart, so to speak. For the past 16 years, I have been a de ntal assistant/office manager for a female dentist. In recent events withRead MoreShort Term And Long Term Career Aspirations983 Words à |à 4 Pagesto mind when I think of my career aspirations. I know I want to do something that makes me happy and I want to make a difference in a personââ¬â¢s life. I realized that I want to be a role model for my younger siblings and cousins because they look up to me. I want to make them proud and show them that you can follow your dreams no matter what. I aspire to obtain my PhD in Marriage and Family Therapy. In this essay I will discuss my short-term and long-term career aspirations and what I want to learningRead MoreSocioeconomic Status And The Career Aspirations Of Australian School Students1279 Words à |à 6 Pageshaving on academic achievement of young adults. These studies range from elementary to college level students. These articles are on the subject of socioeconomic status effecting student aspirations, higher educational par ticipation, and parental involvement. The article ââ¬Å"Socioeconomic status and the career aspirations of Australian school students: Testing enduring assumptionsâ⬠from The Australian Educational Researcher addresses the issue of diversity in school through an examination of socioeconomicRead MoreCareer Development Is the Responsibility of the Individual.735 Words à |à 3 Pagestwo points to substantiate our stand that career development is the responsibility of the company. The two points are, individual career development is limited and career plateau. Firstly, as mentioned by my first speaker, career development is important as it trains employees to be adaptable to different kind of working environment and situations. Furthermore, as stated by Stone 2009, career development is organisation-centered. This means that career development is the companyââ¬â¢ responsibilityRead MoreThe s Dismissal Of Esther s Career Aspirations Essay1894 Words à |à 8 Pagesman. Though these actions seem disconnected from the masculine gender roles, they are almost direct reflections of the societal norms for men. Creative careers such as poetry tend to receive disdain and contempt from society because they engage with sensitivity which is often associated with femininity. Buddyââ¬â¢s dismissal of Estherââ¬â¢s career aspirations is a reflection of the common male opinion that creative work is unrespectable. Had Esther been naive, she mightââ¬â¢ve agreed with Buddy and conformed toRead MoreEssay on The Changing World of Work1176 Words à |à 5 PagesThe Changing World of Work For this assignment the aim of the report it going to focus and explain on how such organisations benefit from career management and in what ways career management benefits individuals. The demand for excellent people is always high but the supply, unfortunately, always falls well short of demand. The naturally excellent sales person, manager, accountant and so on, is already working for someone else perhaps in his or her own business and thereRead MoreMyers Brigg Type Indicator, And The Four Dimensions Of Personality Types1539 Words à |à 7 Pagesfeeling, and judging). People falling into this category are often known as nurturers. Additionally, individuals of this personality type tend to be practical, and sensitive towards otherââ¬â¢s feelings. These traits make the ISFJ personality ideal for careers such as counseling where they are needed to give practical and emotional support. ISFJ personality types are reliable, and exhibit a strong sense of responsibility and duty (Sharf, 2013). Moreover, this personality type prefers organization, planning
Tuesday, May 5, 2020
Care And Diligence Towards His Company â⬠Myassignmenthelp.Com
Question: Discuss About The Care And Diligence Towards His Company? Answer: Introduction The case, which is researched for in this task, is based on the Directors breach of duty under the Corporations Act. The aim of the task is to throw a light upon the facts, which led to the breaching of a directors duty of care and diligence towards his company. The act specifies certain conditions in which the directors are bound to exercise due care and diligence. The violation of which can cause the director to be legally answerable to the court. Thus, the conditions in which the directors of the company acted were in controversy with the provisions in the Corporations Act and therefore, the courts decision is important in light of the case[1]. Storm Financial Limited was a financial service provider company who provided financial advice to the investors. Mr. and Mrs. Cassimatis the, directors of the company were the sole shareholders of the company too. Whilst, they were involved in the various activities of the company, Mr. Cassimatis generated a model to be invested upon. The investors of the company who were retired or near to retirement made the investments. These investors had assets and resources of their investment in limited quantity. The investment entailed the investors to borrow the money against their homes. This would happen when the investors would borrow the money against their homes to invest in the index funds. This was held under contemplation in the court where, it was thought to have been an incompetent step by the directors who ought to be more responsible. The court further claimed that a reasonable director would have had thought about the conditions this model would bring the investors in. A reasonable director in his right mind would think about the likelihood of the retired or near to retirement investors who would be prone to high risks involving their houses mortgaged against their investment. This was thought to have been inappropriately advised by the directors. In conclusion, the court discussed about the directors duties and the breach of the same in this case. The judge purported that the duty of care and diligence must have been the priority in this case and not the financial decision on the advice. This could eventually lead to the reputational harm or by an extent a loss of license due to failure of complying with the laws. Breach of the duties by the director The main allegation which had been brought by the ASIC against the directors in this case was that they have breached section 180(1) of the Corporation Act (CA). The section provides that as an officer or a director of a company a person must act in the best possible interest of the company and in good faith. The section extends to stating that the actions of the directors of officers of a specific company would not be taken as directed towards the companys best interest if a reasonable person in the same position of such director or officer would not have taken such actions in similar circumstances[2]. Thus the AISC alleged that Mr and Mrs Cassimatis did not direct their actions to the best interest of the company as they were involved in providing advice to disadvantaged old people through a financial model created by them[3]. Section 945A and 1041E of the CA had been breached by the directors or not also had to be determined by the case. Section 945 provides that there must be a reasonable basis to provide advice to the clients by the corporation[4]. Section 1041E deals with misleading or false statement made during the course of business. The court had to determine the definition of the subject matter of the advice in relation to section 945A and the meaning of likely to induce according to section 1041E of the CA[5] Analysis of the case In this case the main allegation which had been brought by the ASIC was that the directors of storm had breached section 180(1) of the CA. This was because they had not complied with the provisions of the CA in relation to section 945A and section 1041E of the legislation. The judge in this case provided that it agreed to the fact that the directors have breached the provisions of section 945A of the CA in relation to various investors by not having a reasonable basis in relation to the subject matter of the advice[6]. The judge in this case provided that the plaintiff was not able to establish that the directors of the company had breached section 1041E of the CA as few of the investors who had been provided advice were not retail investors and there was also lack of evidence that some of the investors had retired or were about to retire[7]. The court coming to the main issue of the case provided applied the test provided by section 180(1) in order to determine whether such section had been breached by the directors or not. The allegations were that the directors had breached section 180(1) of the CA by allowing the company to give advice to the investors based on the model developed by them. In addition the section was alleged to be breached as section 1041E and 945A were violated while providing the advice. Through the application of the test the court had to find out whether a prudent extent of care and diligence were observed by the directors of the company towards discharging their duties. it was provided by the court that for the purpose of determining the question of breach all circumstances such as the magnitude of harm, the benefits accruing to the shareholders, the burden to mitigate the risk and the foreeablity of the harm have to be considered. It was found by the court upon the analysis of the factors that t he directors as alleged by the ASIC have violated the provisions of section 180(1) of the CA. This was based on the fact that the breach of section 945A of the CA was reasonably foreseeable by the directors and thus they have breached section 180(1) of thee legislation. The actions would have also predictably caused significant harm to the consumers and most importantly a reasonable person in the same situation would have not violated any provisions of the CA. the violation of law cannot be held reasonable under the business judgment rule as it can never be in the best interest of the company. The court also stated that the circumstances for determining a breach of section 180(1) includes the skills and experiences, the terms and conditions which they had accepted to work as directors of the company. The way in which the responsibilities of the organization were allocated to directors along with the reporting system and information flow within the company was also considered by the court[8]. in addition it was statd by the judge that the directors would not have required any expert advice for the purpose of concluding that the model was not relevant to provide advice to the investors. The most relevant reason provided for this purpose by the court was that the unnecessarily including family home in form of investment asset was not appropriate by the directors[9]. In addition it was also provided by the court that even taking into account that the directors of storm acted in a honest manner "genuinely held the view that capital loss could never occur with index fund investment in the Storm model" 815 the actions were not eligible to be excused in relation to section 1317s of the CA as they had important roles and responsibilities in relation to the company and also the contravention made by them was very serious. In addition the court had to determine the question that whether an actual breach is necessary for the directors for being liable under section 180(1) of the CA. The ASIC had made an allegation that the directors have actually breached section 180(1) of the act as a stepping stone in relation to the violation of the provision. It was provided by the court that it did not have reasonable cause to believe that an actual violation was necessary requirement for non compliance with s180 (1) by a director and proceeded based on the fact that such a breach was not necessary. The court also had to decide that whether the duty arising under section 180(1) of the Act was in relation the company. It was submitted by the directors of storm that according to section 180(1) of the Act the duty arising out of the provisions is only in relation to the company and not to the public. Whereas to the contrary AISC had provided that the duties are not only extended to the company but also to the public. The court in this case did not accept the submission of the AISC in relation to the question. It was provided by the court that with respect to the clear wordings present in the legislation in relation to section 180(1) the duty of the directors is only limited to that of the company. However it was also provided by the court that although a duty under the section does not extend beyond the company, the duty includes not only financial losses but also the loss of goodwill incurred by the company. Thus if the company gets a bad name in the society the duty under section 180(1) of the CA is said to be violated by the directors. Moreover the court had to determine the question that can section 180(1) be violated by directors who are also the only owners and shareholders of the organization. it was submitted to the court by the directors that directors who are the only owners and shareholders of an organization cannot be held liable for the violation of section 180(1) of the CA. In order to support their submission the directors provided that the risk in relation to an operation has to be determined by the directors and shareholders of the company and whether the organization is ready to take such risk for the purpose of making profits. It was in addition given by the directors that it should be considered that the directors have not violated the duty of care and diligence even if the directors have contravened any section of the CA as they are the only shareholders as in such case there would be implied ratification of the actions of the directors[10]. However such a submission was rejected by the court stat ing that the wordings of section 181(1) are not in accordance to the submission made by the directors. Although the shareholders may allow actions which are not in accordance to law but they do not have to power to ratify such actions[11]. Relevance of the decision The main points which can be derived from this case are that the directors of the company cannot be forgiven under section 1317s of the CA if it is found by the court that they have a significant role to play in the organization and the contravention made by them are very serious even if they had acted honestly. The case signifies that the directors of a company who are also its only shareholders can authorize an act which is contrary to that of law, but they do not have the power to ratify such acts as the section 180(1) does not provide for any ratification. The duty which is owed by the directors of the company under section 180(1) although extending only to the company includes not only financial losses but also the loss of goodwill incurred by the company. Thus if the company gets a bad name in the society the duty under section 180(1) of the CA is said to be violated by the directors. An actual breach of section 180(1) is not required for its violation and thus even if actual loss is not caused the directors can be held liable. In addition it was also signified by the court that the breach of any law is always a contravention of section 180(1) of the CA. References Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (No 8) [2016] FCA 1023 [1] Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (No 8) [2016] FCA 1023 at [1] [2] Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (No 8) [2016] FCA 1023 at [2] [3] Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (No 8) [2016] FCA 1023 at [3] [4] Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (No 8) [2016] FCA 1023 at [17] [5] Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (No 8) [2016] FCA 1023 at [16] [6] Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (No 8) [2016] FCA 1023 at [668] [7] Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (No 8) [2016] FCA 1023 at [836] [8] Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (No 8) [2016] FCA 1023 at [676] [9] Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (No 8) [2016] FCA 1023 at [682] [10] Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (No 8) [2016] FCA 1023 at [496] [11] Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (No 8) [2016] FCA 1023 at [499]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)